UX Research & Design · Team of 3 · Fall 2024

myStudentSystem
Redesign

A redesign of MacEwan University's student portal, driven by survey data and student experience.

Background

MacEwan's student portal runs on PeopleSoft which is a third-party student information system used by universities worldwide. Universities stick with it partly because of cost: PeopleSoft automates administrative work that would otherwise take weeks by hand.

Project teams installing PeopleSoft face more than 1,000 configuration choices, and the most successful installations have historically been those that change as little as possible. The result is a system shaped around administrative needs and vendor defaults rather than students.

From the literature review

"On campuses, the most successful installations of PeopleSoft applications have been those that are 'very vanilla.'"

— Olsen, via EDUCAUSE research

What the research found

Through surveys with MacEwan students, we identified the scale of the problem before we started designing anything.

50%

of students had a negative outlook on course enrollment

83%

felt overwhelmed navigating the portal

20+

steps required to enroll in a single course

8

navigation tabs; many redundant, some unexplained

Organization

The navigation was unintuitive. Tabs and pages were not logically named. Related pages were unnecessarily divided. The navbar didn't help you find what you needed. It just linked you back to the homepage.

Access

The most frequently accessed services, particularly class enrollment, were the most complex to reach. Students had to jump between multiple pages to complete basic tasks.

Visual Design

The visual design was basic and didn't use familiar iconography. Excessive use of red created stress and overwhelm.

Who we were designing for

We developed a primary persona based on survey data and student interviews.

User persona: Meghan Barnes — 20 year old BSc Computer Science student at MacEwan. Core needs: manage classes, pay tuition, track degree progress. Frustrations: jumping between pages to enroll, confusion about financial aid vs fees, difficulty tracking required courses.

Primary persona — developed from survey data and student interviews

Before and after comparison of course enrollment sentiment — from 50% negative to 100% positive

Course enrollment sentiment — before and after redesign

Before and after comparison of interface appearance sentiment — users went from overwhelmed to positive

Interface appearance sentiment — before and after

Figma overview of the myStudentSystem redesign

Figma — high-fidelity redesign overview

What's working elsewhere

I analysed three competing student information systems to understand whether switching platforms was a viable option.

Wisenet

Strengths

  • Simple, consolidated platform
  • All information in a single space
  • Easy-to-view metrics

Weaknesses

  • Management-focused, not student-focused
  • Large volume of information to manage
  • Too much hidden in menus

Modern Campus

Strengths

  • Native mobile app
  • Easy-access accessibility mode
  • Easy-to-read course catalog

Weaknesses

  • Two settings buttons placed next to each other
  • Hard-to-read colour scheme
  • Catalog navigation is difficult

Academia by Serosoft

Strengths

  • Separate mobile app and web portal
  • Simple view of academic content
  • Easy offer letter management

Weaknesses

  • Information broken across too many tabs
  • Some pages are overwhelming
  • Sidebar signals importance but gives no detail

The core finding

The competitor analysis made it clear that switching platforms wasn't a viable solution. The alternatives had their own significant problems; and PeopleSoft, when configured correctly, was still the strongest option. The issue wasn't the platform; it was how MacEwan had set it up. Duplicate information spread across multiple tiles, like enrollment appearing in both Academic Progress and Manage Classes, or Fees and Financial Aid split across separate sections, created unnecessary complexity that a better layout could fix.

How we fixed it

Streamline Enrollment

Reduced course enrollment from 20+ steps to a maximum of 3. Consolidated the course search, selection, and confirmation into a single clear flow rather than multiple page transitions.

Accessible Visual Design

Replaced the stress-inducing red-heavy palette with an accessible colour system. Introduced consistent iconography, and the user's current schedule is visible immediately after logging in, rather than buried three pages deep.

Clearer Information Architecture

Renamed and consolidated confusingly labelled tabs. Merged "Financial Aid" and "Fees" into a single financial section. Brought degree progress and course history into one view. Condensed navigation from 8 tabs to 3 dropdown menus and a profile page.

Measured results

50%
negative
100%
positive

Course enrollment sentiment after redesign

83%
overwhelmed
0%
overwhelmed

Students feeling overwhelmed by the interface

20+ 3

Steps to enroll in a course

8 3

Main navigation sections

← View All Projects